Keith Paolino Coaching

Change your Relationship to Desire, and your Desire for Relationship Changes

Keith’s Menu

  • Coaching FAQ
  • About Me
  • Blog
    • Men
    • Relationship
    • Couples
    • Orgasmic Meditation
    • Uncategorized

Service and Purpose in Coaching – a 30 min free writing exercise

May 21, 2017 By Keith Paolino

Exercise – set a 30 min timer.  Write about my connection to service and my purpose with respect to being a professional coach.  Here are the unedited results (I naturally do some editing on the fly, but nothing has been changed since the timer went off)

 

What is the service?  How am I in service?  Why do I believe I have any power or facility to help people through coaching.  What is coaching?

These are questions I wrestle with on the day (and sometimes weeks) where I offer what I do and don’t have any takers.  I look at what I’m doing, why, what’s my motivation.

What is coaching?  What is the service?  This is both the easiest and the hardest question to answer because it’s simple yet doesn’t lend itself to pithy marketing.

The main thing I do is put my attention very intently and completely on another human being.  They talk.  About their lives, their conflicts, their insecurities, judgements, doubts, fears, triumphs, joys, confusions, etc.

I watch my clients fog themselves to the point of obfuscating truths about themselves and/or their situations.  Truths that, with a little time and attention, are easily revealed.  I reflect back to them how they sound, how they act, their body language.  I provide a holotropic mirror in which they can see (and hear) themselves more clearly.  Most of what keeps us held in patterns and “failure” is our own conditioning.  Our conditioning lies to us in our own voice, and as my therapist keeps pointing out, about 60% of our available bandwidth is taken up by our conditioning unconsciously keeping out attention off all the behaviors and aspects of ourselves that we find too painful to see.

Why do I do this?  Let’s be honest.  I’m fascinated with my own process of growth and awakening.  I delight in seeing what’s possible in other human beings so that I remember every day what’s possible in myself.  So yes, a large portion of it is selfish.  I want to gain enough awareness of who I am and how I limit myself so that I may unfold into the greatest version of myself that’s possible in this lifetime.

The irony here is, probably the best version of myself is one who is in service.  I have a heart of service.  I am at my best when my attention is out and I am being well used by people whom I see giving my attention to is a good investment.

What do I get out of service?  I have seen the quality of life that transformation, real, deep transformation, brings to people.  I have seen the powerful combination of therapy and coaching abolish neurosis and fear that eats up a person’s energy and time and happiness.  I have seen women change from fragile or angry beings into confident, loving, powerful beings.

Ach.  None of this is very vulnerable.  It’s all for the audience.  It’s not the truth.  The truth is I love everyone.  I love love love everyone, and it kills me.  As I have learned how to open my heart, how to see and hear people more deeply and fully, I am inundated with pain and fear and misery.  All I want to do is stay on the journey of my own healing and do what I can to help others stay on their own journey of healing.  Through healing trauma, through the deconstruction of conditioning, we gain choice, we gain freedom.  As I’ve learned more and more about my own prison, as I’ve witnessed countless people that I’ve been close to and care about either choose to be free or remain in their own prisons, I feel driven to be of service.   So many have come before me who have helped and held me.  It took many years of hard and consistent work to learn to let love in.  How can I live in this world with these skills and not do the same for others?

Hell, even underneath all that, the simplest truth I can give is that this is what I’m supposed to do.  It’s what I’ve always done.  it’s who I’ve always been.  When I was considering signing up for the year long training to become a coach, the thought that tipped me over into “yes” was simply: You’ve done this as an amateur your whole life.  People come to you to talk to you, to have you listen, to have you reflect to them and give them advice.  You love it, it’s fulfilling to help people in this way.  Let’s get trained so we can do it professionally.    In that training, one thing I learned is NOT to give advice, LOL.  I took the skills I had accidentally developed as a child and young adult, and aimed them at people who were in real emotional turmoil and pain.  As a child I learned to take apart broken things and put them back together in working order. Then as a teenager, I used my listening skills to get the attention from girls I didn’t think I deserved.  Now, I take apart the machinery of deep conditioning, and help people discard the pieces that no longer serve them, integrate more consciously the pieces that are working, and create from scratch the pieces to fill the new empty spaces.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Hardy Boys: The Case of America’s Missing Man

July 21, 2016 By Keith Paolino

hardy_boys_man_in_tunnel_maja_topcagicI’ve been crying on and off for the past 5 days.  By the grace of God and some of the most important men and women in my life, I was shown exactly how deficient I’ve been in my man duties.

I’ve written some interesting things over the last couple years.  Writing about getting fired, and learning about my inner tyrant and how I began the work of changing an emotional legacy into a way to help heal myself and the world.  Writing about what I saw when it came to how men were attracting dating partners and hopefully illuminating some patterns there.  Today I write about coasting on “last year’s recovery”, as my friend Hamza would say.

Recently, me and 20 of the most powerful, generous, loving, feminine-supporting men that I know spent 3 days in a house together.  We were there for atonement to the feminine.  Not the eye for an eye kind.  Rather, we were there to be shown that our energetic credit card debits had FAR EXCEEDED our credits, and that if we could see that, REALLY see it, would we be willing to make a commitment to something greater.  In “getting ours”, we had overspent funds that didn’t just belong to us.  These are funds the feminine toils away in the world to deposit into a common account.    We had become oblivious to our impact.  All of us.  We had been using and abusing our predilection to support the feminine as a way to make ourselves feel better about our resentment, our feelings of powerlessness, and our desire to feel superior.

For me, after 7 years of the practice of Orgasmic Meditation and all of the transformation of the work that goes with it, I had started to use what I learned AGAINST the very feminine that I had promised to serve. Similar to the way you can use what you know about someone you’re intimate with to hurt them when you’re fighting.  I began to use the access I had been granted to overpower, avoid or otherwise undermine the feminine in my life.  Mostly for two purposes: One, to avoid being called to be the man I’m capable of being, and Two, to maintain my ability to feel special and exempt from the former. I found ways to justify not doing my practices.  Not feeding my soul.  Not taking care of myself, physically, spiritually or emotionally.  I allowed a sludge to build up.  I was coasting on last year’s recovery.  I was slowly dying inside, endlessly proving to myself and everyone around me that I am special, and that I did not have to do all the things that everyone else had to do to keep my soul scrubbed clean.

And then, when I slow down, I look around and I see what the women around me are creating, able to hold, able to handle.  How they live in their feminine AND their masculine.  They can birth an idea AND manifest it into existence, both through consistent attention on the idea AND consistent attention on the concrete actions to create it.  Plus they are working on their spiritual and emotional growth, keeping their bodies healthy, earning a living, making sure there’s food in the fridge, keeping a todo list in their heads a mile long, which they frequently revisit and reorder and complete items on.  I see them do it all.  Knowing that if they don’t do it, it simply won’t get done.

And then there’s the men.  Well, let’s be honest.  There isn’t the men.

There are boys.  Mostly boys. Boys who like to dress like men.  Boys who inhabit 25 and 35 and 45 year old bodies.  Boys who look like men dressed like boys.  Boys who run hedge funds and have second mortgages and drive too-expensive cars paid with the second mortgage. Boys with gym memberships, sitting around talking about their dating life with the disdain of a unaffected middle schooler.  Boys who still think their INTENTIONS are good enough.  Boys who have become so adept with the language of change and the comfort of inaction that they think buying carbon offsets is the same thing as saving the world.  Boys who have such distorted visions of their rights and those of others that they would rather kill or rape than have to sit in the discomfort of rejection.  Boys with beards riding longboards down the street, one foot rhythmically kicking as though outrunning adulthood in slo-mo.  Boys who have done such a kickass job convincing the world that they just can’t quite GET IT RIGHT when it comes to growing up that the women have all but given up too.  Instead of searching for a man, the women now just get the good job, build the good credit, buy the nice house, lease the sensible car and then go out and pick themselves a nice man-sized boy to take home and care for and fuck.   Boys who have set the bar of expectation so low that a woman is happy if you put the seat down, earn most of your share of the bills, don’t break anything she likes and remember to do something nice on most of the important days of the year.

“Not me”, you say.

Yes.

You.

Me.

Most of us.  Sitting in the false notion that what we’re doing is good enough, and DON’T EVEN THINK about encroaching on our personal sports/craft/armchair/aficionado/artisan/foodie/time.  Except most of what we make important, isn’t.  And most of us are living at about 20-40% of our capacity.  And then we have the gall to complain when we’re asked to do more, be more.  It’s like a teacher is saying, good job, and I know you can do better, and we look down at the C+ and promptly flip that teacher the bird and say, in that feigned tone that only a 13 year old boy can pull off, “You don’t understand, YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT I CAN DO!!! I’m outta here.”  and turns on one foot and leaves.

So fellas, it’s time to level up.  It’s time to do all the big and little things you said you’d do.  Without her having to ask every day if it got done.  It’s time to handle what you said you were going to handle, or communicate proactively why you aren’t and update your due date accordingly.  It’s time to look at your behavior, to REALLY look.  Time to look at your calendar with a longer view than that morning.  Time to pick up the food you drop and wipe the counter when you get it wet and the thousand other million things you let go of without doing.  You know.  And if you don’t know, get yourself a mentor, or a coach or a therapist or a sponsor, or preferably all four.  Because the time where it’s okay to not know is past.  It’s not cute anymore.  It’s not endearing.  And you don’t want to attract the woman that thinks it is.  Seriously, knock it off.

That is all. PM me or use the comments to discuss.

Sign Up For A FREE Powerful Coaching Conversation

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Conditional Dating or, What happens when you date your mother.

October 23, 2015 By Keith Paolino

human-804512_640A couple years ago I participated in a local gender dialog event.  It was co-hosted by two reputable, longstanding organizations, one that helps women find empowerment and one that helps teach boys to be men.  It was well-attended and loosely facilitated.  After tepid introductions and a few ice-breaker exercises, the room was divided in half, and men and women were seated on opposing sides of the room.  The facilitators then proceeded to moderate a discussion, whereby one person would ask a question of the group on the other side of the room, and multiple people were picked to answer it.

Listening to the men, I realized they kept asking the same question over and over in different forms:

If I am vulnerable, will you take care of my feelings?

This struck me as incredibly unhealthy, and also one possible root for why women feel they have to play small to avoid the backlash of a man’s bruised ego.

Vulnerability as Currency

Being vulnerable doesn’t win you the prize of being taken care of.  Ever.  If you are being vulnerable so that you will be taken care of, you have a covert contract with that person, and that will likely lead to resentment faster than it will lead to connection.  More on that later.

Back to the question, which, if we turn it into a statement – I will be vulnerable if you will take care of me – becomes a conditional statement.  And this is where we get to the heart of why that question is toxic, and how that question delivers the message of entitlement and misogyny that men are born with.  Conditioning.

“Wait!” you say, “The question seems relatively harmless, what are you talking about?!?”

Right? I mean, we enter into intimate partnerships so that we can create security, an environment of unconditional love and acceptance, and, at our best, a place where we can grow as human beings.  Why wouldn’t we ask our partners to be careful with our feelings?  Why wouldn’t we ask for an environment of safety?  What is bad about saying “Please be kind?”  The answer is, asking for a condition under which you are willing to be vulnerable delivers a complex message that very few are equipped to handle.

I will be vulnerable, if you will take care of my feelings equals:

  • I am not capable of handling my own feelings, and can only be vulnerable if someone else validates my safety.
  • I am making you responsible for my future ability to be vulnerable.  Depending on how you handle my feelings, I will choose to shut down my emotions from here on out, or I will use you as the model for all of my future shares.
  • I am broken, less than, unworthy, etc, and need your validation to feel whole, equal, worthy etc.

Another aspect of this is asking our partner to take care of us regardless of how we show up.  If I ask you to take care of my feelings when I am vulnerable, part of that question is will you take care of my feelings no matter how I show up in my vulnerability.  This message becomes “I am going to express my feelings in whatever manner I choose, and it’s your job to approve of that expression no matter how it feels to you.”

Vulnerability as a Practice

It’s my opinion that we are mostly amateurs when it comes to the verbal expression of our internal landscape.  Emotions, feelings, sensations, these are all foreign territory when it comes to verbalizing what’s inside.  It’s normal then, when we first decide that expression is a better choice than holding it all in, just getting words out of your mouth is an accomplishment.  And it usually comes out with all of the backed up blame, anger, resentment and fear that we’ve been using to keep it all down.  That’s natural.  What we forget is that it’s OUR blame, anger, resentment and fear.  It doesn’t belong to the person we are expressing it to, nor is it their responsibility to approve of us in that expression.

This is why therapists, life coaches, support groups, 12 step groups, and transformational programs exist.  These are the spaces that exist for you to practice being vulnerable.  You can practice saying what hurts even though your first tries will be laden with that anger and resentment.  The person you are expressing to is trained to hear you without taking it personally.  There’s a particular kind of intimacy between you that creates a space for expression without causing the listener harm.

However, when men are in an intimate partnership, our conditioning tells us that our partner is supposed to be our one and everything (aka our mother).  We then feel entitled to practice being vulnerable with our partner.  Our anger, resentment, fear, doubt, and blame all come out, usually about 90% of our communication, with the tender thing we mean to express buried somewhere in the rest.  Naturally, our partners react to our entitlement, our expression, our dumping, and then because they are not playing out the role we have assigned to them, we get triggered and the whole situation devolves from there.

Conditioning, Family Systems, and Relationship Templates

We are living out the relationship templates we formed as children.  Before we could talk, we believed the universe revolved around us, that everything happened because of us, and that when something bad happened, because it was our fault the most likely consequence was annihilation.  Because of those beliefs, we developed survival mechanisms for our family relationships.  When there was conflict, because we believed we would be annihilated, we learned how to navigate those relationships to survive them.  Those survival mechanisms became our templates for relating.   Summarizing greatly: Our mother becomes our template for women, our father for men, our siblings for friendships and our extended family for acquaintances and other relationships of varying intimacy levels.  This complex set of rules for navigating each other is known as a family system.  It was our family’s system of relating to each other that we learned to survive, and practiced that system (successfully if you’re reading this) until we moved out of our family home.

Relating to an intimate partner based on a template we developed to survive our family system growing up is simultaneously The Norm, AND a terrible idea.  All of those templates were formed in us when we felt powerless, when we felt the world revolved around us, and when we believed we would die if we didn’t navigate the relationship with the Powerful Person through pleasing, manipulation and deceit.  As adults we are not powerless, we know our place in the world, we know we won’t die if we don’t get what we want, and we are capable of asking for what we want without pleasing, manipulating or deceiving.

But how many of us show up in the world as powerful, autonomous, self-actualized beings who take 100% responsibility for our choices, actions and lives?

Imago and Hope

When we have not yet done the work of deconstruction those templates, and constructed new, healthy ones to put in their place, we relate to our partners using a lot of covert contracts. We have a lot of unexpressed expectations built on what we expect our model for women (our mother) to provide for us.  We operate in our conditioning, get triggered a lot, and live in a near constant state of cognitive dissonance.  “I want to fully know and love the woman I’m in a relationship with, yet I spend a large portion of our interactions acting like an angry, spiteful child.”   It’s confusing, and painful, and because we are conditioned to react to confusion and pain by withdrawing, shutting down, and otherwise stifling our emotions, it can be extremely difficult to change this pattern.

And. There is a lot of opportunity available to us in our relationships.  They provide a litmus test of our emotional development like none other.  Harville Hendrix wrote about the Imago back in 1988 in Getting the Love You Want.  It’s the idea that we unconsciously seek out a relationship with a person who exhibits traits that most trigger our core wound.  And that we can use that relationship to discover the work we need to do to heal that wound.  He said that while we may date many different types, we always PARTNER with our emotional equals.  That no matter how fervently we may actively search for a partner that is nothing like our parents, we unconsciously seek out an Imago partner so that we may see more clearly the parts of us we must heal to show up as our whole selves in the world.

There’s hope for us yet.  If we can choose to see our triggers as information to use for healing, if we can stop punishing our partners for not taking care of us, if we can begin to do the hard work of deconstructing our family system templates, we can have the freedom, joy and fulfillment that comes from being in a healthy, well-adjusted, adult relationship.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Filed Under: Men

I’m a terrible person at my edge. And I refuse to argue against my perfection.

October 8, 2015 By Keith Paolino

living-on-the-edge-844873_1280I’m am sitting in this cafe.  Too much sugar, not enough movement running through my veins.

I am on the backside of a 23 day long peak.  I have been taken to my edge.  I’ve slid out of my range.

I’ve gone unconscious.  I’m out of control.  I’ve been an asshole.  A mean boyfriend, a mean co-worker, a lazy coach, and slid back into survival mode.  Basically, I backed into a corner where I don’t give a fuck about anyone but myself.

I had the pressure of earning a large sum of money before a certain date passes (A massive trigger unto itself).  My girlfriend broke up with me in the middle of our staff meeting (She’s also the boss).  Then the next day she decided that wasn’t what she wanted.  She and I taught 6 classes in 3 weeks (this is the energetic equivalent of giving blood every day for three weeks straight).  We got into a negotiation on a commercial lease, back and forth and forth and back.  We hosted Ulysses Slaughter, a reconciliation specialist, to help our staff tell the truth to each other, and then invited 40 community members to learn about reconciliation in the OneTaste community.  That means 8 people I’m closest to told me things they had been withholding.  They weren’t nice things.  I didn’t say nice things either.

I’m on the backside of a 23 day long peak.  I’m a terrible person at my edge.  Like a rat in a corner.

Everyone I care about turns into the enemy.  They are stupid.  They are plotting against me.  They put me last.  They leave me out.  They are making decisions about my life for me.  They are going to fuck my girlfriend and laugh at me behind my back.  How powerless I am.  How impotent.  How childish.  How weak.  What a joke.

How can I think of myself as a leader if this is who I become under pressure?  How can I teach anyone anything if I am energetically stabbing my co-teacher minutes before we step up to the front of the room?  Who am I to talk about communication or relationships if I’m losing entire conversations?  Text conversations, gone, I have no memory of them, even though they were discussed in front of me at staff meetings.  Multiple times.  Checked. The Fuck. Out.

I’m on the backside of a 23 day long peak and goddammit I’m going to be kind to myself on this side of it.

I’m back enough from the edge to see who I’ve been.  Makes me sick.  And what to do but be with this part of myself?  Can’t run from it.  Don’t want to anymore.  Turn and face it.  My survival mechanisms are entrenched when I run out of fuel.  When I get to the end of my reserves, it ain’t pretty.  And it’s also a place where I don’t have freedom.  I want to hit my reserves and know that’s what’s happening.  I want to be able to communicate to the people around me, the people I care about, that I am nearing the end of my fuel.  That I am going to run out of patience, and smiles and that I will likely be less than pleasurable to be around.

I’m on the backside of a 23 day long peak.  I have seen who I am at my edge.  I am perfect.

Everything that I have experienced has gotten me to where I am.  I could not be here without all of my survival mechanisms.  I would not have stayed sane enough to start on this path if it weren’t for the ways I coped with my dysfunction.  I can love that part of myself.  As scratchy, as raw, as prickly as it is.  I needed those parts to get this far.  I needed those parts to keep myself from dying inside.  I needed that ferocity, that rat baring his teeth animal inside to keep me alive.  And I don’t need them any more.  I want to be kind to myself and my friends when I run out of gas.  I have a home, I have a family, I have a purpose, I have a career.  I have the life I want to be living.  Nothing can take it from me, and man is it hard to tell those parts of me that they are being downsized.

I am on the backside of a 23 day long peak.  I’m sorry for being an asshole.  I love you.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Filed Under: Couples, Men, Relationship

A #Feminist perspective against Affirmative Consent as written by a man with #whiteprivilege

September 11, 2015 By Keith Paolino

yes-238371_640

Okay, so let’s get a few things out of the way.

1) I am a white man who acknowledges and takes care to have awareness of his #whiteprivilege

2) I do not pretend nor endeavor to speak for women.  When I speak of women in the article, I speak about my observations only.

3) I am writing this to open a dialogue around the nature of Affirmative Consent, and for us to look at it closely before it becomes woven into the fabric of our society.

4) I’ve read this and this and this and this and this and this.  Pretty much the first 15 articles that showed up when I googled Affirmative Consent that appeared to be affiliated with a major news organization and didn’t appear to exhibit any dogmatic bias.

5) I have the spent the last 7 years learning feminine communication by exercising my limbic system through the practice of Orgasmic Meditation.  I have around 1200 hours of relationship and intimacy coaching under my belt as of this writing.

First, the good news is that we’re having a conversation about consent at all.  As the author of one of the above-linked articles mentions, it is very recent history where the issue of sexual assault, #rapeculture, and the necessity of consent was not even on the radar of the most important institutions in our nation.  Schools, Universities, Corporations and Government entities were all content to pretend the problem didn’t exist.  Thankfully, due mostly to a group of women who would not be silenced, and who used the power of the internet and social media, that is no longer possible.

Also due mostly to women who would not be silenced, the stigma and perceived futility of reporting sexual assault and rape is waning.  I understand that much more work needs to be done, and that more voices and perspectives and avenues for communication must be opened for the critical mass that is needed to be achieved. And. There are now dozens, if not hundreds, of mainstream examples of women who speak out and whose perpetrators are punished.  This is to be celebrated, not the least of which because it is normalizing the message to girls and young women that it is correct to report being assaulted and/or raped, and to expect justice.  This is a stark contrast to a long history of a culture of slut-shaming and victim-blaming, intended to confuse the issue and keep from having to look at the underlying sickness that creates that culture in the first place.

Now, here’s where I think the idea of Affirmative Consent breaks down, and it’s due primarily to the aforementioned underlying sickness that causes #rapeculture in the first place.  For that sickness to grow and fester, it requires our ignorance of the conditions in which it thrives.  To counter that ignorance,  I’d like to turn your attention now to the concepts of masculine and feminine communication, and how, for some time now, we are trained NOT to use what is at least half of our communication faculties.  Through the ignorance of our feminine mode of communication, we have created conditions that have Affirmative Consent seem like a good idea when it’s not.

And yes, we are hard-pressed to quantify the differences in these two modes of communication. For a quick education on the subject, read this excellent article on Masculine and Feminine, as I won’t cover all of that here.  However, as my friend and teacher(and author of that article) Nicole Daedone likes to say, women are naturally bilingual.  That is, they grow up speaking both feminine and masculine.  Whereas men, on the other hand, tend to grow up only speaking masculine.   This is a serious challenge when you consider that the segment of the population that is linguistically challenged has also held the balance of power for a long time.  How do you get those in power to see that they are deficient in their ability to communicate with the other half?  And even more challenging is the trend where women, being the pragmatic beings that they are, have begun to abandon their own feminine communication mode in order to feel more seen and heard by the half of the population that refuses to learn another language.

Affirmative Consent reinforces this idea that in order for women to be taken seriously, they must move towards a more masculine mode of communication (and therefore, a more masculine mode of consent).  And while I am an enthusiastic proponent of increased expression of desire by women, my experience with the feminine is that greater expression of desire will not automatically mean more concrete expression of that desire.  It may look like an increase in feminine communication in general, and when I am tuned into the communication, I become more aware of her desire.  And this does not usually equate to more specific, granular, easy to understand communication.  And that’s a good thing.  It’s a good thing for men to tune into messages that are communicated in modes that are not simple declarative sentences.

So the biggest strike against Affirmative Consent is that the very nature of adding another layer of masculine communication to an interaction that is inherently AT LEAST 50% feminine communication is naive at best (I mean, how many of YOU understand exactly what your body/soul wants with another human and is then able to clearly and lucidly describe what that is to the other?)  At worst it’s one more subtle message to women (and the feminine in all of us) that they will never get what they want unless they give up all that is feminine communication and get with the damn masculine communication PROGRAM already!

And then we miss another opportunity to teach our young men and women that feminine communication is EVERY BIT AS IMPORTANT as masculine communication.  We have a very complex part of our brain/central nervous system that is extremely adept at non-verbal communication, generally known as the limbic system.  And over the years, as we have placed undue importance on the neocortex, the center for language, reason and complex motor function, our reliance on Aristotelian logic and Broadcast English has become so great that our ability to distinguish nuance, process inference correctly, and otherwise understand someone without them having to spell it out for us has all but vanished from our awareness.

Except it hasn’t.  And that’s where our basic, daily cognitive dissonance comes from.  We are walking around generally confused by our fellow humans, because what we are picking up from them (non-verbal, feminine communication) and what they are overtly saying (verbal, masculine communication) don’t match.  And the rich tapestry of human interaction is being distilled down into boring, stale, lifeless interactions, where fear and doubt rule our receptive abilities.  We have stunted our ability to “hear” each other, because we have stunted our ability to process the information being transmitted, and yet some part of us knows it’s there, because our masculine structures become consumed with wondering “what do they actually mean?” when that cognitive dissonance occurs.

And as we are not taught from a young age to hear the different levels of each communication, including the communications beneath, above and around the actual words being said, that by the time we are adults, we no longer trust in our ability to hear the subtle doubt underneath “Yes”, or the hesitant desire underneath “No”.

Let me be clear, hearing those other messages in the non-verbal communication is NOT a license to ignore the words spoken.  Instead, it instills greater responsibility in both parties to understand each other, because they acknowledge that there is more information being transmitted than just the words being said.

After years of practice (and still many years of practice in front of me), when I hear the hesitation underneath a “Yes”, I have enough awareness to pause, slow down, and ask if she’s sure. When I do that, I create the space for her entire expression. I communicate that I value what she has to say, even if it’s not what I think I want to hear.

Simultaneously, if I hear a “No” that is anything less than definitive and emphatic, I physically back up a little (to demonstrate that I heard her No), and then ask if she’s sure. Again, because I had enough awareness to hear the subtlety of the message. Again, I’m communicating that I value her entire expression, and I help create the space for it to exist between us.

In either case, she has the room she needs to flesh out the subtlety of her communication, and we have both used a blend of masculine and feminine communication to have a fully expressed interaction. [Damn, that bias is EVERYWHERE, I just unconsciously wrote masculine first.]

At this point, now you may be asking yourself how is that different from the Affirmative Consent being discussed in the media? Right? Like, if she says yes and I say how about now and she says yes again, then I’m good, right?

NO.

Affirmative Consent is based on the Savior/Broken-Wing-Bird dynamic that exists between men and women. This model is basically saying: the guy keeps the pressure on, and he gets permission to keep going at each step of the way. And she says yes or no at each stop along the sex escalation path.  At each point the answer is dipolar, and there is no room (nor encouragement of) the exploration of the nuance of each person’s desire.  He follows his training to get as much as he can in the short window of opportunity while it’s open; she follows her training to “give up as little as possible” in exchange for the time spent together.  This is a model that fails both parties.

It is time to train the young men and women of the world that there IS nuance in communication, there IS a way to hear it, and then HOW to use what you hear to create the space between you so EVERYTHING can be communicated.  It’s time to train the young men of the world that feminine communication is real, that it is important, and that it is imperative that they learn to become fluent in it. There are many layers and levels to communication, and we are taught to speak and hear so few.  Affirmative Consent is trying to drive the square peg of masculine communication into the feminine round hole of Desire.

When we acknowledge that Desire (in all its forms, not just sexual), is an inherently feminine thing, and when we acknowledge that in order to communicate it completely and well, we MUST learn to hear and speak feminine communication, only then will we learn to fully communicate what we want and clearly set boundaries that all parties want to respect and adhere to.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »
  • Coaching FAQ
  • About Me
  • Blog

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy · WordPress · Log in